The purpose of this guide is to identify most common factors affecting weighing accuracy and to explain the basic rules of weighing the right way. more
To use all functions of this page, please activate cookies in your browser.
Analytical sample and standard preparation in a pharmaceutical or QA/QC laboratory is typically a manual procedure that requires that solids be weighed and diluted to the mark volumetrically. A minimum of 50 ml of solution is usually prepared for analytical measurements, even though the amount required for each injection is merely a fraction of this. More than 99.9 % of a prepared solution is typically disposed of as waste. Automation of this workflow provides the opportunity to reduce the impact of human variability and uncontrolled environmental factors. Adding the liquid gravimetrically improves precision and reduces solvent and substance consumption by more than 75 %.
The traditional protocol for preparing an analytical sample or standard is to weigh out the specified amount of substance manually on an analytical balance. The substance is then transferred to a volumetric flask and diluted to the mark by filling with the appropriate amount of solvent. 50 ml or 100 ml volumetric flasks are typically used because the larger the flask, the lower the relative error – even though the required amount for today’s analytical methods is only a fraction of this. Modern HPLC or UHPLC (ultra high-performance liquid chromatography) instruments typically require 10 – 20 microliters per injection. Hence, more than 99.9 % of prepared solutions are disposed of without ever being used. The reason for this excess is a combination of two factors: limitations in the minimum weight of powder that can be dosed on a specific analytical balance, and constraints in liquid dosing using volumetric glassware.
An analytical balance has a specific minimum weight according to USP regulations. This means that there is a lower limit on the amount of solid that can be weighed in order to ensure that the required accuracy is achieved. The relative measurement uncertainty of any balance is a hyperbolic function of the weight on the balance (Fig. 1). There is a point where the uncertainty of the measurement becomes too high to have sufficient confidence in the accuracy of the weighed amount. This point is referred to as minimum sample weight or minimum weight.
This minimum weight is determined by the repeatability of the measurement but it varies due to changing environmental conditions, such as vibrations or draft, and the skill of the operator. Therefore, it is recommended that a safety factor of typically 2 or 3 is applied, depending on how stable the conditions or critical the applications.
The safety factor is a multiplier. For example, a minimum weight of 10 mg with an applied safety factor of 2, means that 20 mg is the smallest amount that should be weighed to meet the accuracy requirements.
Being constrained to Class A volumetric glassware may force an analyst to use more substance than necessary because they are limited to the specific intervals of the flasks. In most cases the amount of substance weighed is rounded up to match the volumetric flask size available. If the diluent is weighed instead, there is no size limitation and the minimum amount of solvent can be delivered gravimetrically to achieve the desired concentration.
Typical concentrations in the pharmaceutical industry require several milliliters of solvent, which is equivalent to several grams in weight. Quantifying these amounts on an analytical balance can be done with very high accuracy due to a negligible measurement uncertainty contribution. This is because the weight of solvent required is typically several orders of magnitude higher than the minimum sample weight, and the uncertainty decreases hyperbolically with the net weight (see Figure 1).
Fig. 1 Relative measurement uncertainty decreases hyperbolically with net weight. Accuracy limit is the Minimum Weight
Weighing both the sample and the solvent instead of using a volumetric flask improves reproducibility and traceability and minimizes problems associated with volumetric glassware. The vials in which the samples are prepared can be small and disposable, which eliminates concern about potential cross-contamination. Hidden costs of washing of volumetric flasks and waste disposal are also reduced.
As discussed earlier, the minimum sample weight and the safety factor depend strongly on the user and environmental influences. Automated powder dispensing with the Quantos system can reduce environmental and user variations, and thus significantly reduce both the minimum sample weight and the recommended safety factor. For automated dosing, a safety factor of 1.5 can be applied, providing conditions are stable.
For example, according to USP regulations, the XP205 analytical balance has a minimum weight of typically
21 mg and a recommended safety factor of 2. The Quantos automated dosing balance has a minimum weight 8 mg and a recommended safety factor of 1.5.
If a 1.0 mg/mL solution with a 1 g/mL density is prepared manually using a volumetric flask, 50 mg of substance and 50 mL of solvent are required. When the solution is prepared by the automated gravimetric method, 12 mg of substance and 12 mL of solvent are sufficient. A materials saving of 76 % can be realized whilst remaining compliant with USP regulations. This has a significant impact on the cost of compliance.
Figure 2 illustrates how the minimum weight, the concentration, and the available flask size determine the amount of substance and solvent needed. The red and green lines show the consumption of solvent as a function of the target concentration for the volumetric and gravimetric methods respectively. The consumption of substance is also proportional.
The red line on the graph demonstrates that with the volumetric approach only at four discrete concentrations (horizontal sections) can the minimum net sample weight of 42 mg be weighed. In all other cases, significantly more solvent is consumed because the amount of substance needs to be rounded up to the next flask available.
The green line indicates that when the diluent is weighed gravimetrically the minimum net weight of substance can be used at every target concentration (represented by a smooth curve). No rounding up to the next flask size available is necessary. When quantifying solvent by its weight rather than volume, the corresponding amount of solvent can be dispensed to match the desired concentration.
Fig. 2 Solvent consumption as a function of the desired concentration: volumetric method (red line); gravimetric method (green line)
Automated gravimetric powder and liquid dispensing produces very reproducible concentrations. To demonstrate this, nine solutions of an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) were prepared individually, by automated and manual methods. The solutions were analyzed by HPLC to measure the reproducibility.
Nine solutions with a target concentration of 0.603 mg/g were prepared. Ten milligrams of an API was dispensed automatically into nine 20 mL brown glass vials. Automation allowed 10 mg to be dispensed with accuracy to within an RSD of only 0.89 %. Then, the diluent – an 80:20 mixture of acetonitrile and water – was added gravimetrically based on the exact weight of the API dispensed into each vial. The RSD of the concentrations achieved was 0.001 %.
Next, a 2 µL sample was injected into the HPLC system. The peak areas for the nine individually automatically prepared samples varied with an RSD of 0.19 %; the peak areas for the individually manually prepared samples varied with an RSD of 0.60 %. To highlight the reproducibility of the sample preparation procedure and eliminate the variability contribution of the HPLC injector, 10 repeat injections of the same solution were also analysed. When the same sample was injected 10 times, the peak areas varied with an RSD of 0.21 %.
When sample preparation is automated by weighing the substance and the solvent, the results are extremely reproducible. The variability in the prepared solutions is insignificant because it is lower than the variability of the analytical instrumentation itself.
The use of volumetric flasks and manual powder weighing results in excessive use of solvent and substance. Until now, 99.9 % of prepared solutions are disposed of without being used.
Automated gravimetric sample and standard preparation reduces the minimum weight of the balance and eliminates the need for volumetric flasks, therefore significantly reducing the amount of solvent and substance consumed. Therefore the cost of compliance is significantly reduced. Concentrations can be determined with very high accuracy which makes the process more reproducible and improves the quality of analytical
Literatur beim Autor
The purpose of this guide is to identify most common factors affecting weighing accuracy and to explain the basic rules of weighing the right way. more
This Collection of Moisture Analyzer Methods for Pharmaceutical Industry features moisture methods for pharmaceutical excipients developed by Mettler Toledo. more
Understanding what causes electrostatic charges during weighing, and how to avoid or eliminate them, is critical to avoiding disruption to weighing processes. more
With the model XPR6UD5, Mettler-Toledo presents the first ultra-micro balance on the market, delivers unique 0.5μl resolution more
Save time, money and materials, and invest in a balance that consistently delivers results you can trust. more
The HE73 and HE53 are simple to use, even for untrained operators more
Balance accessories for your laboratory scale can help to simplify your processes and ensure you get the accurate results you want. more
METTLER TOLEDO's comprehensive product range provides users with flexibility and precision in every application plus outstanding quality and functionality. more
METTLER TOLEDO has launched its new Dubai Free Zone Competence Center. This new facility will offer advanced analytical support for all industries operating in the Middle East and North Africa. It will also provide hands-on equipment training for METTLER TOLEDO’s range of products, which ar ... more
Mettler Toledo presents a special offer for 2016 - a limited-edition, full-color lab calendar. More than a way to track days and dates, this 12-month calendar will provide a series of enlightening topics devoted to ensuring weighing accuracy in all critical lab processes. Using calendar pag ... more
The English version of the q&more online portal is now available online. The q&more portal was developed in a unique cooperation between succidia AG and CHEMIE.DE Information Service GmbH, and is supported by METTLER TOLEDO. It is aimed specifically at decision-makers, and uses attractive c ... more
Enzymes, as biocatalysts, are a suitable, environmentally friendly alternative to heavy metal industrial catalysts. The “Green Chemistry” nature of enzymes as catalysts is based on a number of characteristics. Enzymes are biodegradable and typically produced through fermentation of renewabl ... more
Inline Process Analytical Technology (PAT) has become critical in ensuring process robustness and productivity in the biotechnology industry. By implementing in situ probe based particle measurement technology, real time changes can be tracked to the floc size distribution while measuring i ... more
A best practice during process development involves understanding safety risks associated with a chemical reaction. The earlier that non-scalable conditions are recognized, the more easily a process can be modified with improvements for safety. This webinar discusses new techniques that all ... more
A few years ago the term “Industry 4.0” was used to describe a future vision of digitized production. This concept is now being implemented by industry. It is characterized by a high degree of automation and networked processes, without which global competitiveness would no longer be achiev ... more
Laboratory 4.0, the internet of things (IoT), big data, cloud computing or storage, blockchain, cybercrime, thingbots, predictive maintenance, artificial intelligence et al.: the thicket of buzzwords is getting denser almost by the day. They feature in just about every newspaper article abo ... more
The management concept “Lean Laboratory” is increasingly being implemented in the laboratory environment, with the aim of optimizing efficiency. An essential approach here is the “First-Defect-Stop”, which is based on the Jidoka principle and refers to the earliest possible identification o ... more
Wolfgang Boos, born in 1965, initially trained as an Information Technician before studying Technical Computer Science at Flensburg University of Applied Sciences (Germany), graduating with a diploma degree. He subsequently worked as a software developer at the Forschungszentrum Jülich, Ins ... more
Daniel Fuchs studied Services Marketing and Management (MAS SMM) at the University of Lucerne and holds degrees in Product and Service Marketing of the Swiss Federal government and expertise in Lean Management principles. In 1992 Daniel Fuchs joined Mettler-Toledo Laboratory Weighing and is ... more
Marianne Portmann is Head Global Marketing and Business Development GWP at Mettler Toledo. She holds a Master degree in Service Marketing and Management from University of Lucerne/Zurich and looks back on several years in Service innovation. For the past six years, she was heavily involved ... more
XPR Analytical Balances are the right choice for challenging weighing applications, such as weighing the smallest sample sizes, with exceptional accuracy and a readability of 5 micrograms. Save time, money and materials, and invest in a balance that consistently delivers results you can tru ... more
In today's high pressure research and manufacturing environments, having the right equipment is key to achieving quality and efficiency. With customers demanding short lead times and reliable delivery dates, you need a balance you can trust to deliver accurate results - and which is conveni ... more
Daily weighing routines are easy and efficient thanks to the ergonomic design features of the NewClassic ME balances. Essential functionality is at your fingertips to provide you with accurate and reliable weighing results day after day. But there is more. These robust all-round balances no ... more
Over 50% of out-of-specification (OOS) results in analytical workflows are reportedly caused by sample processing and operator errors (…)
The q&more concept is to increase the visibility of recent research and innovative solutions, and support the exchange of knowledge. In the broad spectrum of subjects covered, the focus is on achieving maximum quality in highly innovative sectors. As a modern knowledge platform, q&more offers market participants one-of-a-kind networking opportunities. Cutting-edge research is presented by authors of international repute. Attractively presented in a high-quality context, and published in German and English, the original articles introduce new concepts and highlight unconventional solution strategies.
> more about q&more
q&more is supported by: